New tool helps researchers spot problematic trials before they distort evidence
Problematic studies, including those affected by human error or research misconduct, can distort the evidence that systematic reviews rely on and, in turn, influence treatment guidelines. This can lead to inaccurate or even harmful recommendations. A recent example was a review of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19. Some of the trials used in the systematic reviews were not authentic,…
Read original article on Medical Xpress - latest medical and health news stories →Related news
-
Long-acting injectable antipsychotics provide better outcomes in bipolar disorder and older schizophrenia patients
-
Nursing home beds are becoming more scarce
-
Air pollution and cardiovascular disease: Mitochondria may be the missing link
-
New polymer could enable gastrointestinal transit monitoring without ionizing radiation
-
How stores choose what to put on their shelves — like, say, Planet Money's board game
-
IBD not linked to risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy overall
-
Landmark trial evaluates chemotherapy benefit in high-risk early-stage breast cancer
-
FDA panel narrowly backs multi-cancer blood test despite doubts it works